Integrated M.S.-Ph.D. in Data Science, Seoul National University
I believe agents can already solve many of the problems we face in the real world. Still, people want better agents, and I don't think we get there just by making models code or complete tasks more accurately. We get there by understanding how agents actually behave, and what values they carry while doing so. My research covers these two sides: Agents and Value Alignment.
I'm currently looking for a summer internship where I can contribute to research on agents or value alignment. I'm also always open to collaboration. Reach me at opusdeisong@snu.ac.kr.
Two papers accepted to the main conference
Presidential Science Scholarship for Graduate Students
One paper accepted to the main conference
One paper accepted for publication
One paper accepted
One paper accepted to Findings
One paper accepted to the main conference
See all on the Publications page.
Under Review
Agents Trust Tools Too Much: Measuring Reliance on Unreliable ToolsTool-using agents are usually evaluated as if their tools always return the truth. We corrupt what web search, sub-agent delegation, and code execution return, and find that fourteen LLMs adopt the corrupted content at high rates, up to 68% for web search. Reasoning traces show agents often notice the conflict and recover the right answer internally, yet still report only the corrupted one, and none of our prompting, metadata, or post-training interventions fixes this across the board.
Paper Agents
EMNLP 2026Main
ArcANE: Do Role-Playing Language Agents Stay in Character at the Right Time?Role-playing agents should evolve with their character, not hold a fixed persona. ArcANE, an automatically built benchmark of 17 novels and 80 characters, shows that conditioning on a Character Arc, the narrative segmented into psychological phases, outperforms every other context strategy, most of all on scenarios the source text never explores.
EMNLP 2026Main
Human Psychometric Questionnaires Mischaracterize LLM BehaviorThe psychological profile an LLM reports on a questionnaire is not the one it shows when actually generating text. Familiar questionnaire items cue socially desirable answers, and persona effects that appear on questionnaires vanish on realistic user queries. We argue models should be profiled by what they generate, not what they self-report.